Intern Transitions of Care Curriculum Through Posthospital Home and Skilled Nursing Facility Visits

MD, MsED,
PhD, MPH,
MBA,
MD,
PhD, RN, CRNP,
MD, MPH,
PhD, MSW, and
MD
Online Publication Date: 01 Aug 2018
Page Range: 442 – 448
DOI: 10.4300/JGME-17-00499.1
Save
Download PDF

ABSTRACT

Background 

Transitions of care pose significant risks for patients with complex medical histories. There are few experiential medical education curricula targeting this important aspect of care.

Objective 

We designed and tested an internal medicine transitions of care experience integrated into interns' ambulatory curriculum.

Methods 

The program included 1-hour group didactics, a posthospitalization discharge visit in pairs with a home care nurse (cohort 1: 2011–2012; cohort 2: 2012–2013), and a half-day small-group visit to a skilled nursing facility led by a faculty member in geriatrics (cohort 2 only). Both visits had structured debriefings by faculty in geriatrics. For cohort 1, a quantitative follow-up survey was administered 18 to 20 months after the experience. For cohort 2, reflections were analyzed.

Results 

Thirty-three of 42 second-year residents (79%) in cohort 1 who participated in didactics and a home visit completed the survey. Seventy-six percent (25 of 33) reported increased knowledge of interprofessional team members' roles and the discharge process for patients with complex medical histories. Seventy-nine percent (26 of 33) reported continued use of medication reconciliation at discharge, and 64% (21 of 33) reported the experience enhanced their ability to identify threats to transitions. Of cohort 2 interns, 88% (42 of 48) participated in the home visit and 69% (33 of 48) in the skilled nursing facility visit. Intern reflections revealed insights gained, incomprehensive discharge plans, posthospital health care teams, and patients' postdischarge experience.

Conclusions 

An experiential transitions of care curriculum is feasible and acceptable. Residents reported using the curriculum 18 to 20 months after exposure.

Introduction

Policymakers have highlighted the need to improve the quality of care and safety in hospital discharges,16 and the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education has identified transitions of care as a core competency, with milestones focusing on the ability to communicate a safe discharge plan effectively with the patient, interprofessional team, caregiver, and the next care provider.711

Residents are responsible for care transitions, yet feel they lack the knowledge of how to safely complete these tasks, and studies have found a need to increase resident knowledge in transitions of care.1219 Experiential learning theory suggests that learning is best done in the context in which it occurs, and that interactions are fundamental to gain understanding.20,21

To address the need for experiential learning, we embedded an innovative curriculum in our existing postgraduate year 1 (PGY-1) ambulatory block. It provided for direct exposure to different medical environments, including home care and skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), interactions with interprofessional team members, and review of hospital discharge documentation. We hypothesized that this experiential method of learning would improve residents' skills for safe patient discharges.

Methods

Study Design and Setting

Two cohorts of PGY-1 internal medicine residents at an urban academic tertiary medical center completed the transitions of care curriculum. When this program was launched, it had no formal transitions of care curriculum.

Home Visit Curriculum

We implemented the curriculum from September 2011 through June 2013 (cohort 1; figure 1). Core didactics were integrated into the ambulatory curriculum. Each intern participated in a 1-hour small-group didactic on “Transitions in Care” delivered by core geriatrics faculty (R.K.M.). Topics included identifying vulnerable patients, working in interprofessional teams, medication reconciliation, discharge summaries/instructions, and patient and family communication.

Figure 1. Cohort 2 CurriculumFigure 1. Cohort 2 CurriculumFigure 1. Cohort 2 Curriculum
Figure 1 Cohort 2 Curriculum

Citation: Journal of Graduate Medical Education 10, 4; 10.4300/JGME-17-00499.1

A pair of interns were assigned to conduct a posthospitalization discharge home visit with a home care nurse. Each nurse participated in a brief session to review teaching goals and objectives. The patients were primarily African-American, Medicare-eligible, and middle-lower socioeconomic status, with multiple chronic comorbidities and on multiple medications. The interns had not previously met the patients they were visiting due to logistical barriers to arranging visits for their patients.

Interns were expected to complete a medication reconciliation form and a transitions of care checklist, covering medication management, medical care and home services follow-up, patient and family roles, and understanding of the discharge process.22,23 A 1-hour debriefing session led by geriatrics faculty (R.K.M.) was conducted during the last didactic session of the 4-week block. Each intern pair described the patient seen in the home and key transition issues they had encountered.

SNF Curriculum

For cohort 2, which took place in 2012–2013, groups of 4 to 7 interns participated in structured, half-day visits to SNFs led by a faculty member in geriatrics or a fellow who cared for patients at that facility. The SNF visit was added to the curriculum in response to intern and faculty feedback on the value of seeing an alternative discharge site of care. The visit focused on key aspects of care transitions, including basics of SNFs, medication reconciliation, communications with staff, and discharge summaries/instructions. During the tour, interprofessional team members taught residents about their roles and discussed key elements of a successful discharge plan from hospital to SNF using examples of recent discharge summaries. Patients going to SNFs were a similar patient population to those visited in homes. The SNF staff also led a 20-minute debriefing session at the end of the visit.

This study was approved under the University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board.

Data Collection and Analysis

Survey data from cohort 1 (interns completing a home visit) were collected 18 to 20 months after completion of the transitions of care experience (at the end of PGY-2). The survey was developed by the authors without additional testing. The survey had a variety of open-ended and closed questions (provided as online supplemental material).

Cohort 2 interns were asked to complete separate reflections about the home and SNF visit. Open-ended writing allowed interns to synthesize their experiences on the home and SNF visits. The home visit reflections were discussed at the 1-hour group debriefing session on the last day of the ambulatory block. The SNF reflections were completed on site and discussed as a group. Reflections were guided by 3 questions: (1) How did this experience alter your perception of discharge? (2) How will the experience change your care for patients? (3) Were there any surprises?

Reflections were transcribed by the Mixed Methods Research Lab at the University of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia, PA) and entered into NVivo 10 software (QSR International Pty Ltd, Doncaster, VIC, Australia). We used applied thematic analysis in an iterative, 2-step process to examine the data. Applied thematic analysis is an inductive approach that allows the researcher to describe the explicit and implicit ideas that arise in the data.24 The initial broad set of codes were emergent from the data, assigned a priori, and focused on 5 themes: (1) barriers after discharge; (2) facilitators after discharge; (3) discharge instructions; (4) impact of home visits; and (5) intern expectations and surprises. Coders included a geriatrician with experience in transitions of care who led the curriculum design (R.K.M.), a third-year resident (Z.S.), and 2 qualitative research experts (S.K. and Z.S.). Coders initially applied these broad codes to each line of text. In a second phase of coding, each broad theme was subcoded into emerging categories. Subcoding proceeded in an iterative fashion as categories were created, reviewed, compared, and collapsed until no new themes emerged. Subcodes were discussed iteratively by the team as they emerged.

A subset of 16 reflections, including 8 from SNF and 8 from home visits, were double-coded for interrater reliability to ensure that all coders understood and defined the codes in the same way. A kappa statistic was calculated for each broad code across all 16 double-coded narratives. Coding discrepancies were resolved by consensus among all members of the team, resulting in a final average kappa of 0.75.

Results

Seventy-nine percent (33 of 42) of the PGY-2s in cohort 1 who participated in didactics and a home visit completed the survey. After the transitions of care experience, 76% (25 of 33) of the respondents reported increased knowledge of the role of the interprofessional team and the discharge process for patients with complex, chronic illnesses; 79% (26 of 33) reported they continued to use what they learned about medication reconciliation at hospital discharge; and 64% (21 of 33) reported an ability to identify potential threats to transitions between sites of care. Fifty-eight percent (19 of 33) indicated that the knowledge gained in home health services influenced current practice; and 24% (8 of 33) noted the experience influenced their performance of functional assessments (figure 2).

Figure 2. Cohort 1: What Aspects of Transitions of Care Experience Do You Maintain in Your Current Practice?Figure 2. Cohort 1: What Aspects of Transitions of Care Experience Do You Maintain in Your Current Practice?Figure 2. Cohort 1: What Aspects of Transitions of Care Experience Do You Maintain in Your Current Practice?
Figure 2 Cohort 1: What Aspects of Transitions of Care Experience Do You Maintain in Your Current Practice?

Citation: Journal of Graduate Medical Education 10, 4; 10.4300/JGME-17-00499.1

Of 48 residents in cohort 2, 42 (88%) participated in the home visit and 33 (69%) in the SNF visit. A total of 69 reflections were included in the analysis (6 essays were missing).

Qualitative analysis revealed 3 overarching themes: (1) the importance of completing comprehensive discharge plans and instructions; (2) awareness and admiration of posthospital health care teams; and (3) understanding the realities patients face postdischarge. The box contains quotes for each theme and subthemes described below.

Comprehensive Discharge Plans and Instructions

Medication Reconciliation: 

Interns recognized the importance of providing detailed medication reconciliation often after witnessing patients and home care nurses refer to the discharge instructions in an effort to understand the medication regimen. Interns were struck by the number of medications patients required, and several interns vowed to make a concerted effort to finish summaries prior to discharge and to make instructions clear and simple.

Communicating More With Patients and Their Families

Interns reflected on the need to spend more time communicating with patients and their families before discharge. These reflections were usually prompted by witnessing a problem with the patient's care that the interns believed could have been avoided through better communication.

Scheduling Follow-Up Appointments

Interns identified where patients had barriers to understanding their disease and treatment, and who would benefit from early follow-up. They also discussed language and health literacy barriers to prompt follow-up.

Awareness and Admiration for Posthospital Health Care Teams

Aptitude and Quality of Home Health Care Team: 

Many interns recognized the significance of interprofessional communication and home health care nurses' skills. Many praised the quality of nurses' care, patient-centered approach, and their ability to implement the discharge instructions and to work with providers to prevent rehospitalizations.

Level of Care Provided by SNFs

Most of the interns who visited SNFs were surprised at the high level of care they witnessed. Interns were impressed by the thorough intake evaluation, the interprofessional approach with physical therapy, and the support with daily living activities, and a few also mentioned they were pleasantly surprised by social activities offered at the SNF. Interns commented on the high nurse-to-patient ratio.

Understanding the Realities Patients Face Postdischarge

Those who visited patients at home appreciated the limitations of some living situations, whereas those who visited the SNF noted how staff could affect patient health outcomes.

Assessing Living Situation and Social Support

Home visits helped interns recognize how a patient's environment could create barriers to care and recovery. They described mobility problems related to clutter, carpeting, and stairs and environmental factors, such as smoke and pets. They also mentioned the impact of neighborhood safety and patients living alone without reliable social support or patients' care.

Self-Efficacy

Several interns mentioned instances in which patients' ability to take charge of their own care and understand their treatments were important keys to facilitating effective transitions posthospitalization. In many instances, the nurses helped reinforce the patient's self-efficacy.

Program Feasibility

The curriculum was embedded in the ambulatory rotation, and the half-day experiences replaced subspecialty clinics. For each year, the lead faculty (R.K.M.) spent 8 hours in didactic time (core and debriefing session). Matching the schedules of PGY-1s, home care nurses, and SNF providers required approximately 16 h/y. That time was initially supported by grant funding and, later, by the internal medicine residency. Home care nurses spent 2 to 3 hours per session with the interns and participated 3 to 4 times a year. Since the nurses were seeing patients with the interns, the time had little effect on productivity. The SNF professionals (all academic faculty or geriatrics fellows) each spent 1.5 to 2 hours and participated 2 to 3 times a year. The teaching responsibility was shared by multiple providers, and visits were scheduled in groups of 5 to 7 to minimize the number of sessions needed.

Discussion

Our transitions of care curriculum resulted in sustained intern awareness of key issues, such as medication reconciliation and importance of communication, 18 months later. The experience was positively received by residents, and the didactics, postdischarge home visit, SNF visit, and debriefing have continued for 7 years.

Our results support a recent study demonstrating that experiences with a postdischarge clinic visit, home visit, or telephone call were correlated with increased perceived responsibility for transitional care tasks.19 We provided learning experiences with patients, a variety of health care professionals, and sites of care, all directly involved in transitions of care.

This program is distinct from other effective transitions of care interventions. Published reports of educational interventions have included postdischarge visits for patients that residents had treated in the hospital and postdischarge and sites of care visits occurring during the 2- to 4-week geriatric or transitions of care rotations.1719 Embedding the curriculum in the ambulatory schedule facilitated teaching larger groups of interns, and the block scheduling helped with scheduling home care nurses and SNF providers. Our approach did not allow interns to see patients for whom they had provided care in the hospital, but we demonstrated both the feasibility of the visits and the interns' self-reported learning of key transition issues, likely due to the strength of experiential learning with patients and health care teams.20

Establishing relationships between medical education, home care, and skilled nursing facilities can create a learning environment needed for this type of curriculum. Finding champions in local home care agencies and SNFs is important. To prevent workflow interference, coordinating the interns' schedules to align with home care nurse visit schedules is essential. By using a group of nurses as part of the teaching team, we made accommodations when needed. For the SNF clinicians, visits were scheduled in small groups to minimize the number of sessions needed.

This study has several limitations. It was conducted at a single institution, limiting generalizability. We relied on interns to self-report changes in knowledge or behavior, and positive responses could have been due to social desirability. Our survey was not tested for validity evidence, and respondents may not have interpreted items as intended.

Future research should include a review of the care plans compared with what actually happens after discharge. This could include direct observation of patient care in a postdischarge clinic and root cause analysis for readmissions. These opportunities may improve our understanding of the multifactorial issues that lead to poor transitions of care and allow continued evaluation of curricular components and effect.

Conclusion

We demonstrated that a transitions of care curriculum incorporating a posthospital home discharge visit and an SNF visit was well received and feasible. The curriculum has continued with the support of the internal medicine residency program, home care nurse agency, and health care providers of geriatric services.

References

  • 1
    Snow V,
    Beck D,
    Budnitz T,
    et al.
    Transitions of care consensus policy statement American College of Physicians–Society of General Internal Medicine–Society of Hospital Medicine–American Geriatrics Society–American College of Emergency Physicians–Society of Academic Emergency Medicine. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(
    8
    ):971976.
  • 2
    [MedPAC] Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. Report to the Congress: Improving Incentives in the Medicare Program.
    Washington, DC
    :
    MedPAC
    ; June2009.
  • 3
    Bodenheimer T.
    Coordinating care—a perilous journey through the health care system. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(
    10
    ):10641071.
  • 4
    Forster AJ,
    Murff HJ,
    Peterson JF,
    et al.
    The incidence and severity of adverse events affecting patients after discharge from the hospital. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138(
    3
    ):161167.
  • 5
    Naylor MD,
    Aiken LH,
    Kurtzman ET,
    et al.
    The care span: the importance of transitional care in achieving health reform. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011;30(
    4
    ):746754.
  • 6
    Snow V,
    Beck D,
    Budnitz T,
    et al.
    Transitions of care consensus policy statement: American college of physicians, Society of General Internal Medicine, Society of Hospital medicine, American Geriatrics Society, American College of Emergency Physicians, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. J Hosp Med. 2009;4(
    6
    ):364370.
  • 7
    Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education; American Board of Internal Medicine. Internal Medicine Milestone Project. July2015. https://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/PDFs/Milestones/InternalMedicineMilestones.pdf. Accessed June 29, 2018.
  • 8
    Lurie SJ,
    Mooney CJ,
    Lyness JM.
    Measurement of the general competencies of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education: a systematic review. Acad Med. 2009;84(
    3
    ):301309.
  • 9
    Chan B,
    Englander H,
    Kent K,
    et al.
    Transitioning toward competency: a resident-faculty collaborative approach to developing a transitions of care EPA in an internal medicine residency program. J Grad Med Educ. 2014;6(
    4
    ):760764.
  • 10
    Hauer KE,
    Soni K,
    Cornett P,
    et al.
    Developing entrustable professional activities as the basis for assessment of competence in an internal medicine residency: a feasibility study. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28(
    8
    ):11101114.
  • 11
    Green ML,
    Aagaard EM,
    Caverzagie KJ,
    et al.
    Charting the road to competence: developmental milestones for internal medicine residency training. J Grad Med Educ. 2009;1(
    1
    ):520.
  • 12
    Buchanan IM,
    Besdine RW.
    A systematic review of curricular interventions teaching transitional care to physicians-in-training and physicians. Acad Med. 2011;86(
    5
    ):628639.
  • 13
    Greysen SR,
    Schiliro D,
    Horwitz LI,
    et al.
    “Out of sight, out of mind”: housestaff perceptions of quality-limiting factors in discharge care at teaching hospitals. J Hosp Med. 2012;7(
    5
    ):376381.
  • 14
    DeCaporale-Ryan LN,
    Cornell A,
    McCann RM,
    et al.
    Hospital to home: a geriatric educational program on effective discharge planning. Gerontol Geriatr Educ. 2014;35(
    4
    ):369379.
  • 15
    Greysen SR,
    Schiliro D,
    Curry L,
    et al.
    “Learning by doing” resident perspectives on developing competency in high-quality discharge care. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(
    9
    ):11881194.
  • 16
    Matter CA,
    Speice JA,
    McCann R,
    et al.
    Hospital to home: improving internal medicine residents' understanding of the needs of older persons after a hospital stay. Acad Med. 2003;78(
    8
    ):793797.
  • 17
    Pavon JM,
    Pinheiro SO,
    Buhr GT.
    Resident learning across the full range of core competencies through a transitions of care curriculum. Gerontol Geriatr Educ. 2018;39(
    2
    ):144159.
  • 18
    Schoenborn NL,
    Christmas C.
    Getting out of silos: an innovative transitional care curriculum for internal medicine residents through experiential interdisciplinary learning. J Grad Med Educ. 2013;5(
    4
    ):681685.
  • 19
    Young E,
    Stickrath C,
    McNulty M,
    et al.
    Residents' exposure to educational experiences in facilitating hospital discharges. J Grad Med Educ. 2017;9(
    2
    ):184189.
  • 20
    Yardley S,
    Teunissen PW,
    Dornan T.
    Experiential learning: AMEE guide No. 63. Med Teach. 2012;34(
    2
    ):e102e115.
  • 21
    Kaufman DM,
    Mann KV.
    Teaching and learning in medical education: how theory can inform practice. In:
    Swanwick T,
    ed. Understanding Medical Education: Evidence, Theory and Practice.
    West Sussex, UK
    :
    John Wiley & Sons;
    2010:729.
  • 22
    Coleman EA.
    Medication discrepency tool (MDT). 2011. http://caretransitions.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/MDT.pdf. Accessed June 29, 2018.
  • 23
    Coleman EA,
    Parry C,
    Chalmers S,
    et al.
    The care transitions intervention: results of a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(
    17
    ):18221828.
  • 24
    Guest G,
    MacQueen KM,
    Namey EE.
    Applied Thematic Analysis.
    Thousand Oaks, CA
    :
    SAGE Publications Inc;
    2012.
Copyright: 2018
word
<bold>
  <sc>Figure</sc>
  1
</bold>
Figure 1

Cohort 2 Curriculum


<bold>
  <sc>Figure</sc>
  2
</bold>
Figure 2

Cohort 1: What Aspects of Transitions of Care Experience Do You Maintain in Your Current Practice?


Author Notes

Funding: Dr Miller was supported by the Donald W. Reynolds Foundation Award and Health Resources and a Health Resources and Services Administration for a Geriatric Academic Career Award (grant number K01HP20495).

Conflict of interest: The authors declare they have no competing interests.

These data have been previously presented as an abstract poster at the 35th Annual Meeting of the Society of General Internal Medicine, Orlando, Florida, May 9–12, 2012, and at the 37th Annual Meeting of the Society of General Internal Medicine, San Diego, California, April 23–26, 2014.

The authors would like to thank Amy Westcott, Joshua Uy, Lynsey Brandt, and Soumya Bollampally, for their help in design and implementation of the skilled nursing facilities curriculum; and Penn Care at Home Nurses and Advanced Practice Nurses on the Transitional Care Model team, who volunteered their time for teaching on the posthospital discharge home visit.

The information, content, and conclusions are those of the authors and should not be construed as the official position or policy of, nor should any endorsements be inferred by, the Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Bureau of Health Professions, or the US government.

Editor's Note: The online version of this article contains the transitions of care educational experience follow-up survey.

Corresponding author: Rachel K. Miller, MD, MsED, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, 3615 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, 917.364.4136, rachel.miller@uphs.upenn.edu
Received: 14 Jul 2017
Accepted: 15 May 2018
  • Download PDF